| Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente Prochaine révision | Révision précédente Prochaine révisionLes deux révisions suivantes |
| teaching:psychologie_de_l_education [2021/02/20 00:08] – [Références, sources,...] villersd | teaching:psychologie_de_l_education [2021/07/09 13:15] – [Références, sources,...] villersd |
|---|
| * [[https://mobile.twitter.com/SChewPsych|Twitter Stephen Chew]], [[https://sites.google.com/view/nwsccofrc/understanding-learning/dr-stephen-chew|website]], [[https://www.samford.edu/departments/academic-success-center/how-to-study|How to Study Video Series]] + **[[https://www.samford.edu/departments/files/Academic_Success_Center/How-to-Study-Teaching_Resources.pdf|Teaching guide]]** | * [[https://mobile.twitter.com/SChewPsych|Twitter Stephen Chew]], [[https://sites.google.com/view/nwsccofrc/understanding-learning/dr-stephen-chew|website]], [[https://www.samford.edu/departments/academic-success-center/how-to-study|How to Study Video Series]] + **[[https://www.samford.edu/departments/files/Academic_Success_Center/How-to-Study-Teaching_Resources.pdf|Teaching guide]]** |
| * //Cf.// particulièrement Table 1. The cognitive challenges of effective teaching | * //Cf.// particulièrement Table 1. The cognitive challenges of effective teaching |
| | * **[[https://www.nature.com/articles/s41539-021-00091-x|An fMRI study of scientists with a Ph.D. in physics confronted with naive ideas in science]]** Allaire-Duquette, G., Brault Foisy, LM., Potvin, P. et al. npj Sci. Learn. 6, 11 (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41539-021-00091-x |
| | * **Abstract :** A central challenge in developing conceptual understanding in science is overcoming naive ideas that contradict the content of science curricula. Neuroimaging studies reveal that high school and university students activate frontal brain areas associated with inhibitory control to overcome naive ideas in science, probably because they persist despite scientific training. However, no neuroimaging study has yet explored how persistent naive ideas in science are. Here, we report brain activations of 25 scientists with a Ph.D. in physics assessing the scientific value of naive ideas in science. Results show that scientists are slower and have lower accuracy when judging the scientific value of naive ideas compared to matched control ideas. fMRI data reveals that a network of frontal brain regions is more activated when judging naive ideas. Results suggest that naive ideas are likely to persist, even after completing a Ph.D. Advanced experts may still rely on high order executive functions like inhibitory control to overcome naive ideas when the context requires it. |
| | * **Résumé :** L'un des principaux défis à relever pour développer la compréhension conceptuelle des sciences consiste à surmonter les idées naïves qui contredisent le contenu des programmes d'enseignement scientifique. Les études de neuro-imagerie révèlent que les lycéens et les étudiants activent les zones frontales du cerveau associées au contrôle inhibiteur pour surmonter les idées naïves en sciences, probablement parce qu'elles persistent malgré la formation scientifique. Cependant, aucune étude de neuro-imagerie n'a encore exploré la persistance des idées naïves en sciences. Ici, nous rapportons les activations cérébrales de 25 scientifiques titulaires d'un doctorat en physique évaluant la valeur scientifique des idées naïves en science. Les résultats montrent que les scientifiques sont plus lents et moins précis lorsqu'ils évaluent la valeur scientifique d'idées naïves par rapport à des idées de contrôle appariées. Les données d'IRMf révèlent qu'un réseau de régions frontales du cerveau est plus activé lors de l'évaluation d'idées naïves. Les résultats suggèrent que les idées naïves sont susceptibles de persister, même après l'obtention d'un doctorat. Les experts avancés peuvent encore compter sur des fonctions exécutives de haut niveau, comme le contrôle inhibiteur, pour surmonter les idées naïves lorsque le contexte l'exige. |
| | * Twitter : [[https://mobile.twitter.com/dylanwiliam/status/1407374441143750656|Dylan William]] → "More evidence that learning in science appears to be less a process of "conceptual change" and more a process of suppressing intuitive conceptions in favour of more powerful ones (cf Kahneman's thinking fast and slow)" |
| |
| |
| * autres liens : [[http://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1983960]], [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263080929_From_Cognitive_Modeling_to_Self-Regulation_A_Social_Cognitive_Career_Path|lien RG]] | * autres liens : [[http://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1983960]], [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263080929_From_Cognitive_Modeling_to_Self-Regulation_A_Social_Cognitive_Career_Path|lien RG]] |
| |
| ===== Near and far transfer in cognitive training ===== | ===== Transfer of learning ===== |
| FIXME | FIXME |
| * E. L. Thorndike, “The Influence of First Year Latin upon the Ability to Read English,” School Sociology 17 (1923): 165–168. | * E. L. Thorndike, “The Influence of First Year Latin upon the Ability to Read English,” School Sociology 17 (1923): 165–168. |
| * Sala, G., Aksayli, N. D., Tatlidil, K. S., Tatsumi, T., Gondo, Y. et Gobet, F. (2018). Near and far transfer in cognitive training: a second-order meta-analysis. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/9EFQD | * Sala, G., Aksayli, N. D., Tatlidil, K. S., Tatsumi, T., Gondo, Y. et Gobet, F. (2018). Near and far transfer in cognitive training: a second-order meta-analysis. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/9EFQD |
| * [[https://www.aft.org/ae/spring2020/debruyckere_kirschner_hulshof|If You Learn A, Will You Be Better Able to Learn B?]] Understanding Transfer of Learning, By Pedro De Bruyckere, Paul A. Kirschner, Casper D. Hulshof, article excerpted from their book More Urban Myths about Learning and Education: Challenging Eduquacks, Extraordinary Claims, and Alternative Facts (Routledge, 2020) [[https://www.routledge.com/More-Urban-Myths-About-Learning-and-Education-Challenging-Eduquacks-Extraordinary/De-Bruyckere-Kirschner-Hulshof/p/book/9780815354581|ref]] | * [[https://www.aft.org/ae/spring2020/debruyckere_kirschner_hulshof|If You Learn A, Will You Be Better Able to Learn B?]] Understanding Transfer of Learning, By Pedro De Bruyckere, Paul A. Kirschner, Casper D. Hulshof, article excerpted from their book More Urban Myths about Learning and Education: Challenging Eduquacks, Extraordinary Claims, and Alternative Facts (Routledge, 2020) [[https://www.routledge.com/More-Urban-Myths-About-Learning-and-Education-Challenging-Eduquacks-Extraordinary/De-Bruyckere-Kirschner-Hulshof/p/book/9780815354581|ref]] |
| | * [[https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED611647|Reconceptualizing Learning Transfer: A Preparation for Future Learning]] Thomas A. Rausch and Leann M. R. Kaiser, 2020 ([[https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED611647.pdf|fulltext]]) |
| |
| ===== Psychologie du développement, psychologie cognitive ===== | ===== Psychologie du développement, psychologie cognitive ===== |
| * [[https://cogscisci.wordpress.com/glossary/]] | * [[https://cogscisci.wordpress.com/glossary/]] |
| * ... | * ... |
| | * livres |
| | * [[wp>fr:Système_1_/_Système_2_:_Les_deux_vitesses_de_la_pensée|Système 1 / Système 2 : Les deux vitesses de la pensée]] (Daniel Kahneman) |
| |
| |
| |
| |