Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente Prochaine révision | Révision précédente |
teaching:biblio-10.1021-acs.chemrev.8b00020 [2019/10/07 12:45] – [Autres références] villersd | teaching:biblio-10.1021-acs.chemrev.8b00020 [2020/07/12 17:20] (Version actuelle) – [Concepts inventories] villersd |
---|
| |
Voir aussi (accès restreint) : | Voir aussi (accès restreint) : |
* [[/teaching:didactiquechimie:two-tier_multiple_choice|two-tier multiple choice]] diagnostic instruments (questions à choix multiple avec justification) | * [[teaching:didactiquechimie:two-tier_multiple_choice|two-tier multiple choice]] diagnostic instruments (questions à choix multiple avec justification) |
* [[teaching:didactiquechimie:qcm#qcm_dans_le_domaine_de_la_chimie]] | * [[teaching:didactiquechimie:qcm#qcm_dans_le_domaine_de_la_chimie]] |
| |
| |
* divers : | * divers : |
* Talanquer, V. Concept Inventories: Predicting the Wrong Answer May Boost Performance. J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94, 1805– 1810, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00427 | * Talanquer, V. Concept Inventories: Predicting the Wrong Answer May Boost Performance. J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94, 1805– 1810, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00427 |
| * [[https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500690601072964|A National Survey of Students’ Conceptions of Chemistry]] Mei‐Hung Chiu (2007) in Taiwan, International Journal of Science Education, 29:4, 421-452 DOI: 10.1080/09500690601072964 |
| |
| |
* Claesgens, J.; Scalise, K.; Wilson, M.; Stacy, A. Mapping Student Understanding in Chemistry: The Perspectives of Chemists. Sci. Educ. 2009, 93, 56– 85, DOI: 10.1002/sce.20292 | * Claesgens, J.; Scalise, K.; Wilson, M.; Stacy, A. Mapping Student Understanding in Chemistry: The Perspectives of Chemists. Sci. Educ. 2009, 93, 56– 85, DOI: 10.1002/sce.20292 |
* Becker, N. M.; Rupp, C. A.; Brandriet, A. [[https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2017/rp/c6rp00205f#!divAbstract|Engaging Students in Analyzing and Interpreting Data to Construct Mathematical Models: An Analysis of Students’ Reasoning in a Method of Initial Rates Task]]. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2017, 18, 798– 810, DOI: 10.1039/C6RP00205F → **kinetics** | * Becker, N. M.; Rupp, C. A.; Brandriet, A. [[https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2017/rp/c6rp00205f#!divAbstract|Engaging Students in Analyzing and Interpreting Data to Construct Mathematical Models: An Analysis of Students’ Reasoning in a Method of Initial Rates Task]]. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2017, 18, 798– 810, DOI: 10.1039/C6RP00205F → **kinetics** |
| * [[https://www.stem.org.uk/best-evidence-science-teaching|Best Evidence Science Teaching]] (University of York) : collection of free research evidence-informed resources for effective teaching of difficult ideas, embedded formative assessment and adaptive lesson planning : |
| * **[[https://www.stem.org.uk/best/chemistry-earth-science/big-idea-substances-and-properties|Substances and properties]]** |
| * **[[https://www.stem.org.uk/best/chemistry-earth-science/big-idea-particles-and-structure|Particles and structure]]** |
| * **[[https://www.stem.org.uk/best/chemistry-earth-science/big-idea-chemical-reactions|Chemical reactions]]** |
| * [[http://assessment.aaas.org/@AAAS Science Assessment]] : QCM, concepts et références |
| |
Importance de la metacognition : | Importance de la metacognition : |
| |
===== Autres références ===== | ===== Autres références ===== |
| * [[wp>Concept_inventory|Concept inventory]] |
| * [[wp>Chemistry_education|Chemistry education]] |
* [[https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed074p1076|Research in Chemical Education - the Third Branch of Our Profession]] Journal of Chemical Education 1997, 74 (9) , 1076. DOI: 10.1021/ed074p1076 | * [[https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed074p1076|Research in Chemical Education - the Third Branch of Our Profession]] Journal of Chemical Education 1997, 74 (9) , 1076. DOI: 10.1021/ed074p1076 |
| * [[https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed400716p|Evaluating the Content and Response Process Validity of Data from the Chemical Concepts Inventory]] Paul Schwartz and Jack Barbera, Journal of Chemical Education 2014, 91 (5), 630-640. DOI: 10.1021/ed400716p |
* [[https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed400716p|Evaluating the Content and Response Process Validity of Data from the Chemical Concepts Inventory]] Paul Schwartz and Jack Barbera, Journal of Chemical Education 2014, 91 (5), 630-640. DOI: 10.1021/ed400716p | |
* [[http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed079p739|An Inventory for Alternate Conceptions among First-Semester General Chemistry Students]] Douglas R. Mulford & William R. Robinson, J. Chem. Educ., 2002, 79 (6), p 739 DOI: 10.1021/ed079p739 (y compris **tests**) | * [[http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed079p739|An Inventory for Alternate Conceptions among First-Semester General Chemistry Students]] Douglas R. Mulford & William R. Robinson, J. Chem. Educ., 2002, 79 (6), p 739 DOI: 10.1021/ed079p739 (y compris **tests**) |
| * [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3bt7uRb5Dw|CER Webinar: Stacey Lowery Bretz & Michael Klymkowsky - Discussion about Concept Inventories between lead researchers in chemistry and biology education]], 20/05/2020 (utiliser les sous-titres si utile) |
| |
| |